Has GE lost its leadership development mojo?

April 20, 2010 by Wally Bock

The cover story in the current Business Week asks a stunning question: “Can GE Still Manage?” There have been many stories over the last few years about today’s GE not performing like the GE of old, or at least the GE of Welch.

What makes this story stunning is that it doesn’t focus on stock price or the performance of various GE units. It doesn’t even suggest breaking up GE. Instead the question is about the one thing that seemed like a sure thing for GE: leadership development.

There’s a lot of history behind today’s leadership development at GE. The idea that GE’s most important product is leaders, not light bulbs or even progress, has been around since Charles Coffin at the turn of the Twentieth Century.

Two men are primarily responsible for the way GE does leadership development today. Jack Welch and Bill Conaty. Conaty was head of human resources at GE for thirteen years.

The crown jewel of the program is the leadership development campus at Crotonville, just up the Hudson from New York City and a 45-minute drive from GE headquarters in Connecticut. Nine thousand managers attend programs there every year.

The core process is “Session C.” That’s the rigorous annual review of the performance and potential of GE managers. Some writers call it “notorious.”

Today, Jeff Immelt thinks that GE needs to rethink both the critical skills for our changing world and the processes for developing leaders. So it’s time for a little creative destruction.

If there is a company with a track record of creative destruction, it’s GE. GE’s leaders from Coffin to Welch and now to Immelt have been willing to rip out legacy processes and structures, just about at the time when everyone else is adopting them.

The goal is to change the details while hanging on to two things that all companies who are good at leadership development seem to do. GE will probably continue to provide lots of training and lots of development opportunities. What will probably change are the frequency and delivery methods.

GE will probably also continue to make leadership development a priority for all managers. Develop yourself. Develop your subordinates. That takes lots of time and discipline, but it’s perhaps the only essential for effective leadership development.

Will GE succeed in changing a process that has been its strength for decades? “We’ve always done it that way before” and “Why change something that works so well?” can block progress at GE as much as anywhere.

Will the change be successful? If there’s any company you’d want to bet on, this is the one.

But there are no guarantees. You’re only as good as your last bout of creative destruction.

Wally Bock is a coach, a writer and President of Three Star Leadership.

Posted in Leadership Development

If You Enjoyed This Post...

You'll love getting updates when we post new articles on leadership development, 360 degree feedback and behavior change. Enter your email below to get a free copy of our book and get notified of new posts:

  1. Daniel Gonzalez says:

    Hello…I’d like to make contact with Kenneth Nowack, the objetive is ask him about the “Stress Profile” test published in 1999. I’m part of a Research group at UNAM and we’re interested in applying this test in spanish but on-line…so..if you coul help us would be great. Have such a nice day.

  2. Ken Nowack says:

    Daniel…thanks for your interest in our stress/resilience assessment called StressScan http://www.envisiatools.com/products/Stress-Inventory/Stress-Scan/index.asp

    We do have an online version in multiple languages including Spanish

    You can email me directly at ken@envisialearning.com for additional research questions

Follow Envisia Learning:

RSS Twitter linkedin Facebook

Are You Implementing a Leadership Development Program?

Call us to discuss how we can help you get more out of your leadership development program:

(800) 335-0779, x1